This calculator does one thing: it converts between an A1c percentage and the estimated average glucose (eAG) it corresponds to, in either direction, using the ADA-endorsed ADAG regression. It is meant as a quick, focused cross-reference — not a full diabetes management tool.

What eAG Means

A1c results are reported as a percentage, which is useful for tracking trends but does not map intuitively onto the mg/dL or mmol/L numbers most people see on a glucose meter or continuous glucose monitor day to day. Estimated average glucose (eAG) closes that gap by translating an A1c percentage into the average blood glucose value it statistically corresponds to over roughly the same two-to-three-month window the A1c test itself reflects.

The American Diabetes Association reports eAG alongside A1c on its own patient materials specifically so that people can relate a lab percentage to the glucose units they already track daily. This calculator applies the identical published formula, so the number you get here will match what a clinic or ADA calculator would report for the same input.

Where the Formula Comes From

The eAG regression comes from the A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study, published by Nathan and colleagues in Diabetes Care in 2008. Researchers had roughly 500 adults wear continuous glucose monitors and take frequent self-measured glucose readings over several months, then compared those measured averages against each participant's lab A1c. The result was a simple linear relationship: eAG (mg/dL) = 28.7 x A1c(%) - 46.7.

Because the formula is a straight-line fit to real average-glucose data rather than a theoretical derivation, it is described as a population regression. That is a meaningful distinction from a calculation like an exact unit conversion — the formula estimates the typical relationship for people similar to the study cohort, not a physical law that holds identically for every individual.

Why Your Personal Average Can Differ

Because eAG is derived from a study average rather than measured directly, an individual's true glucose average can differ from the calculated eAG by a meaningful margin — commonly cited as 15 to 20 mg/dL in either direction. Differences in red blood cell lifespan (affected by iron-deficiency anemia, hemolytic conditions, recent blood transfusion, or hemoglobin variants) can shift a person's A1c away from what their actual glucose average would predict, which in turn shifts the eAG calculated from it.

For this reason, eAG works best as a translation aid — a way to sanity-check a lab A1c against the glucose numbers you already see on a meter or CGM — rather than as a substitute for either measurement. If your calculated eAG consistently diverges from your directly measured average, that is worth raising with a clinician rather than adjusting anything based on this calculator alone.