Time dilation is one of the most famous — and most misunderstood — predictions of Einstein's special relativity: a moving clock runs slower than a stationary one, and the faster it moves, the bigger the effect. This calculator turns that idea into a concrete number using the Lorentz factor, so you can see exactly how much a clock's tick rate changes at any given velocity.

Why Motion Slows Down Clocks

Special relativity starts from a strange but experimentally verified fact: the speed of light is the same for every observer, no matter how fast they're moving. To keep that true, space and time have to bend around each other — an observer watching a clock move past them will measure that clock ticking more slowly than an observer traveling alongside it does. This isn't a trick of light delay or measurement error; it is a real difference in the rate time passes, confirmed by comparing atomic clocks flown on airplanes, by the extended lifetimes of fast-moving muons in the atmosphere, and by the everyday operation of GPS satellites.

Reading the Lorentz Factor

The Lorentz factor γ = 1/√(1 − v²/c²) is the single number that captures how strong the relativistic effect is at a given velocity. At everyday speeds — cars, planes, even orbital spacecraft — γ is so close to 1 that the correction is measured in nanoseconds. It's only as velocity approaches a significant fraction of c that γ climbs noticeably: at 50% of c it's about 1.15, at 90% of c it's about 2.29, and at 99% of c it's about 7.09. Push toward 99.99% of c and γ exceeds 70 — the closer v gets to c, the more explosively γ grows, which is also why no massive object can ever reach c itself (it would require infinite energy to push γ to infinity).

Limits and What This Calculator Assumes

This calculator implements the standard special-relativity time dilation formula for a single, constant relative velocity between two inertial (non-accelerating) observers — it does not account for gravitational time dilation (from general relativity, relevant near massive bodies) or for acceleration effects (relevant to the classic "twin paradox"). It also assumes velocity is entered accurately as a fraction of c or in m/s; garbage in the velocity field, including any value at or above the speed of light, produces an undefined result rather than a false answer, since nothing with mass can travel at or beyond c.