Mean absolute deviation is one of the simplest ways to describe how spread out a data set is — take every value's distance from the center, average those distances, and you have a single number that answers "how far do values typically sit from the middle?" It's easier to compute by hand and easier to interpret than variance or standard deviation, which is why it's often introduced first in statistics courses.
How MAD is calculated
MAD starts the same way variance does: pick a center point (the mean, most commonly) and measure how far every value sits from it. But instead of squaring each deviation, MAD takes the absolute value — stripping the sign so a value 3 below the center and a value 3 above it both count as a distance of 3, without one canceling the other out. Those absolute deviations are then averaged: sum them all up and divide by the number of data points. The result is expressed in the same units as the original data, with no need for a separate square-root step like standard deviation requires.
MAD about the mean vs MAD about the median
Most textbook definitions measure MAD about the mean, but measuring about the median is a valid and sometimes more useful alternative. Because the median depends only on rank order rather than magnitude, it doesn't shift much when an extreme value is added to the data set — while the mean can be pulled substantially toward that outlier. As a result, MAD about the median is more robust: it tends to give a smaller, more representative figure for data sets that include occasional extreme values, while MAD about the mean can end up inflated by the very outlier it's trying to describe.
MAD vs standard deviation
Both MAD and standard deviation measure dispersion, but they treat large deviations differently. Standard deviation squares every deviation before averaging, which means a value far from the center contributes disproportionately more to the final number — a single outlier can dominate the whole calculation. MAD only takes the absolute value, so a large deviation still counts more than a small one, but not nearly as dramatically. This makes MAD a gentler, more outlier-resistant summary of spread, at the cost of some of the convenient mathematical properties (like its relationship to the normal distribution) that make standard deviation the default choice in most formal statistical work.